Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |From cda7fd4e732c6db03180301e45b48b961fda5eba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 |From: Danny O'Brien |Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 16:45:29 -0800 |Subject: [PATCH] Activate a window in response to _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW | |By default, dwm response to client requests to _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW client |messages by setting the urgency bit on the named window. | |This patch activates the window instead. | |Both behaviours are legitimate according to |https://specifications.freedesktop.org/wm-spec/wm-spec-latest.html#idm140200472702304 | |One should decide which of these one should perform based on the message |senders' untestable claims that it represents the end-user. Setting the |urgency bit is the conservative decision. This patch implements the more |trusting alternative. | |It also allows dwm to work with `wmctrl -a` and other external window |management utilities. |--- | dwm.c | 10 ++++++++-- | 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) | |diff --git a/dwm.c b/dwm.c |index ff893df..b278182 100644 |--- a/dwm.c |+++ b/dwm.c -------------------------- Patching file dwm.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 515. Hunk #2 succeeded at 525. Hmm... Ignoring the trailing garbage. done