Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |From 116830e90487d53cbe44c05a8c0ffe8985e1509e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 |From: BrunoCooper17 |Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 22:31:37 -0500 |Subject: [PATCH] An updated single_tagset patch for dwm-6.2 | |Description |This patch addresses the multi-monitor setup. Instead of having separate tags for every monitor there is just one list of tags for all monitors. Instead of moving windows from one monitor to the other, the desired tag from the other monitor can just be selected and all windows will be drawn on the current monitor. | |Several deep changes needed to be made: | |Macro ISVISIBLE expects a second parameter, the monitor |Monitor->clients and Monitor->stack were moved to the global variable Clientlist cl. All monitors refer to this one list. |A new method attachclients was added. When changing between tags this function ensures that all clients are pointing to the right monitor. | |Authors |Jan Christoph Ebersbach - jceb@e-jc.de |Mohammad Zeinali - mzeinali@tutanota.com |Jesus Mastache Caballero - | |--- | dwm.c | 226 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- | 1 file changed, 171 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) | |diff --git a/dwm.c b/dwm.c |index b0b3466..10d7f6e 100644 |--- a/dwm.c |+++ b/dwm.c -------------------------- Patching file dwm.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 49. Hunk #2 succeeded at 82. Hunk #3 succeeded at 125. Hunk #4 succeeded at 141. Hunk #5 succeeded at 190. Hunk #6 succeeded at 274. Hunk #7 succeeded at 307. Hunk #8 succeeded at 389. Hunk #9 succeeded at 410. Hunk #10 succeeded at 519. Hunk #11 succeeded at 606. Hunk #12 succeeded at 652. Hunk #13 succeeded at 672. Hunk #14 succeeded at 722. Hunk #15 succeeded at 731. Hunk #16 succeeded at 771. Hunk #17 succeeded at 846. Hunk #18 succeeded at 900. Hunk #19 succeeded at 1169. Hunk #20 succeeded at 1256. Hunk #21 succeeded at 1422. Hunk #22 succeeded at 1476. Hunk #23 succeeded at 1601. Hunk #24 succeeded at 1678. Hunk #25 succeeded at 1718. Hunk #26 succeeded at 1755. Hunk #27 succeeded at 1763. Hunk #28 succeeded at 1803. Hunk #29 succeeded at 1823. Hunk #30 succeeded at 1942. Hunk #31 succeeded at 1972. Hunk #32 succeeded at 1995. Hunk #33 succeeded at 2135. Hunk #34 succeeded at 2170. Hunk #35 succeeded at 2237. Hmm... Ignoring the trailing garbage. done